In its latest efforts to establish a human
right to abortion the UN trough its High Commissioner for Human Rights
Navanethem Pillay, who was recently reappointed for a second term of Office, has
issued a shockingly pro-abortion manifesto using the vitally important issue of
reducing maternal mortality and morbidity as a vehicle for the presentation of her deadly
agenda.
Under the guise of publishing "technical guidance"
promoting maternal health, Ms Pillay has issued a report seeking to make
effective opposition to abortion provision unlawful on the part of parents; and
to criminalize health professionals, administrators and NGOs who seek to oppose
abortion provision - including abortion provision to children under the age of
consent.
The document A/HRC/ 21/22 is titled, "Technical guidance on the
application of a human rights-based approach to the implementation of policies
and programmes to reduce preventable maternal morbidity and mortality".
"This technical guidance report purports to be about
reducing maternal mortality and morbidity. However the main thrust of the
document instead of focusing on issues central to the reduction of maternal
mortality, contains a thinly disguised pro-abortion agenda.
"The guidance report includes, amongst other things,
attacks on:parental rights, freedom of conscience and freedom of speech. It contains 87
references to 'sexual and reproductive health', 27 of which also refer to
'sexual and reproductive health rights'. These are terms which are misused by
powerful governments and politicians, like Barack Obama and Hilary Clinton, and
UN bodies, to promote abortion on demand throughout the world.
"There are two references to comprehensive sexuality
education and various references to goods and services in the context of sexual
and reproductive health.
"The report identifies 'rights holders' and 'duty
bearers' and stipulates the obligations of the duty bearers. Such obligations
include the removal of all barriers to sexual and reproductive health (SRH)
services including abortion, abortifacients and contraceptives, which are
defined as 'fundamental rights'.
"The technical guidance report in paragraph 22
stipulates that States should act against so called interference by third
parties including NGO’s if they object to the agenda set out in the document.
"It also stipulates that States should enforce laws and
policies and that 'States may be held responsible for private acts if they fail
to act with due diligence to prevent, investigate and punish violations of
rights'.
"The technical guidance doesn’t simply call on States
to take action, it makes States liable if they do not act against anyone or
anything seen as a barrier to the implementation of the sexual and reproductive
health agenda set out in the document which as we saw includes abortion,
explicit sex education for minors and paragraph 30 attacks among other issues
laws that ban abortion and conscientious objection and laws that would allow
for parental notification before providing contraception or abortion to
children.
Ms Pillay in publishing this report is seeking to make
effective opposition to abortion provision unlawful on the part of parents; and
to criminalize health professionals, administrators and NGOs (like SPUC) who
seek to oppose abortion provision - including abortion provision to children
under the age of consent."
"According to Ms Pillay's report, laws and policies
that impede access to sexual and reproductive health services must be changed,
including laws criminalizing certain services only needed by women; laws and
policies allowing conscientious objection of a provider to hinder women’s
access to a full range of services; and laws imposing third-party authorization
for access to services by women and girls.
"The technical guidance calls for Comprehensive Sexuality
Education (CSE) in schools and for a budget to be available for dealing with
teenage pregnancies through the education system in addition to budgets in the
health system. The report footnotes the United Nations Educational, Scientific
and Cultural Organization, (UNESCO) International technical guidance on
sexuality education"
Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE)
CSE is a highly controversial, rights-based approach to sex
education that encompasses much more than simply teaching children and youth
about sexual intercourse and human reproduction.
CSE programmes can be disguised under a variety of different
names such as sexual and reproductive health counseling, information or
services; HIV education; life skills programs; sex- education; sexual
education; sexuality education; Social Personal and Health Education (SPHE)
etc.
Common Components of CSE Programmes
They claim access to CSE is a human right
They Encourage acceptance and exploration of diverse sexual
orientation and gender identities,
They Promote the use of condoms,
They Promote abortion as acceptable, safe and without
consequences,
They Encourage youth to advocate for sexual rights
They Teach youth without parental knowledge or consent under
the guise of confidentiality or privacy rights
They Promote sexual pleasure as a right and necessary for
sexual health,
They Promote masturbation as healthy and normal
They Teach children and youth they are sexual from birth
They Encourage anal and oral sex and peer to peer sexuality
education
In 2009 UNESCO in partnership with UNICEF, UNFPA, WHO and
UNAIDS published controversial International Guidelines on Sexuality Education
which suggest among other things, teaching five-year-old children that they can
touch their body parts for sexual pleasure.
After a number of UN Member States complained, UNESCO
released a new publication called the International Technical Guidance on
Sexuality Education, which was not quite as controversial as their original
guidelines although many of the objectionable publications were still
footnoted.
