Criminal complaints filed in France in respect of HPV Vaccines

We have reported on numerous occasions on HPV vaccines such as Gardasil and along with many others have highlighted the ongoing problems associated with them but health boards in general seem unwilling to listen to reason and continue to roll out new vaccination programmes.

Sanevax report that criminal complaints have been filed in France against yet to be named defendants regarding severe injuries after Gardasil vaccinations. The complaints were filed by Camille Krouchner on behalf of ten young women, ages 18 to 24, suffering from a variety of autoimmune disorders including lupus, Guillain-Barré, ADEM, idiopathic hypersomnia and multiple sclerosis after being injected with the HPV vaccine, Gardasil.

According to lead Counsel, Camille Kouchner, the reason Sanofli Pasteur MSD is not directly named as the only defendant is because:

    “The one thing these young women have in common is they have all contracted severely debilitating diseases in the weeks and months following vaccination when they had no medical history. There are many stakeholders and (we) must seek everyone’s responsibility.”

Gardasil was launched in France in 2006 as a preventive measure against cervical cancer. Almost immediately, safety concerns began showing up in medical journals and news reports from the United States, Spain, Germany and Austria. These concerns are being echoed in countries around the world including India, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Japan, Israel, Mexico, Columbia, Peru, New Zealand, Sweden, and The Netherlands, just to name a few.

According to French philosopher and social scientist, Elena Pasca:

    “You cannot kill the Gardasil based on singular stories, scientific demonstration is required; but there is circumstantial evidence against the vaccine.”

Ms. Pasca is absolutely correct. Scientific validation should be required – if safety of the vaccine for some individuals was the only issue at hand. Unfortunately, that is not the case.

According to Dr. Spinosa, gynecologist from Switzerland, analysis of peer-reviewed studies of Gardasil’s efficacy indicates:

 “Even if we vaccinated 85% of girls aged 12 until 2060, assuming it (Gardasil) is 100% effective and immune for life – after 52 years, cervical cancer would decrease 10%; cervical cancer mortality by 13%…”

The SaneVax Team believes it is high time government health authorities take the concerns of medical/scientific experts seriously. The issue of side-effects and HPV vaccines should have never arisen.

When injecting a healthy population against one risk factor for cervical cancer – NO RISK TO CURRENT HEALTH IS ACCEPTABLE – particularly when said vaccine has not been proven to eliminate even one case of cervical cancer.

Gardasil Victim Speaks Out

We published a BLOGPOST two weeks ago dealing with some of the problems associated with the Human Pappiloma Virus (HPV) vaccine, Gardasil. That story related to a report in the British Medical Journal about a 16-year-old girl who became infertile following vaccination with Gardasil.

Today we are linking to a video of another young woman who has also suffered greatly following vaccination with Gardasil.

-->

We have blogged on this issue on many occasions since August 2008 and appealed to the then health Minister Mary Harney to refrain from making this vaccine available in Ireland.

My letter to the then Minister set out the problems associated with this vaccine and continued with the following warning.

"I would also suggest Minister that unless this decision is reversed as a matter of urgency it has the potential to become another major national scandal and could open the Irish exchequer to future claims of a substantial nature, given that the information in regard to these adverse reactions is already in the public domain. "

Despite my requests and the requests of many others the vaccine has been made available and is now in use in this country. It seems that both the Government and the Health Services Executive  (HSE) are more attuned to, and willing to impose, an international agenda rather than being open to reason.

16-year-old girl became infertile from Gardasil vaccine: British Medical Journal

According to a LifeSiteNews.com news report - The British Medical Journal (BMJ) has reported that a healthy 16-year-old Australian girl lost all ovarian function and went into menopause after being injected with the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine Gardasil.

We have on numerous occasions referred to the problems associated with the Gardasil vaccination programme because of the injuries, illnesses and deaths that  have been found to be associated with it.   We reported in 2011 that since its introduction, nearly 100 deaths had taken place at that time, and nearly 22,000 adverse reactions had been recorded worldwide.   In Ireland alone, hundreds of adverse reactions have been reported to the authorities – which have ignored this information.

Two ingredients of Gardasil – sodium borate (pesticide) and Polysorbate 80 – are linked to infertility.  As well as that, the link between Gardasil and the huge increase in stillbirths and the early death of children in the womb is already well documented.

The LifeSite article reads:

Dr. Deirdre Little, the Australian physician who treated the girl, provides solid evidence that Gardasil caused the destruction of the girl's fertility.

She also pointed out that Merck Pharmaceutical, the manufacturer of Gardasil, has no supporting information on the effects of the vaccine on ovaries, suggesting that Merck had either done no safety testing on Gardasil in relation to its effects on women's reproductive systems, or had suppressed the information.

Dr. Little's report states that before the Gardasil vaccination, the girl had regular menstrual cycles, had been thoroughly examined and tested, and had no family or personal medical history that could explain the premature menopause.

The girl received the Gardasil vaccination in the fall of 2008. By January 2009, her cycle had become irregular. Over the course of the next two years, her menses became increasingly scant and irregular, until by 2011, she had ceased menstruating altogether.

"This patient presented with amenorrhoea after identifying a change from her regular cycle to irregular and scant periods following vaccinations against human papillomavirus," Dr. Little wrote in the report.

Dr. Little carried out numerous tests on the girl, including checking hormone levels and internal organ function, and diagnosed her as having "premature ovarian failure." She also found that the girl had no living egg cells.

After investigating other possible causes of the girl's premature ovarian failure, Dr. Little was left with the Gardasil vaccination as the only remaining explanation.

"Although the cause is unknown in 90% of cases, the remaining chief identifiable causes of this condition were excluded. Premature ovarian failure was then notified as a possible adverse event following this vaccination," Dr. Little stated.

In the report titled "Premature ovarian failure 3 years after menarche in a 16-year-old girl following human papillomavirus vaccination," Little wrote that Merck had only tested Gardasil's effects on the testes of rats.

Dr. Little contacted the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) of Australia, the equivalent of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), for information about the safety testing of Gardasil on women's ovaries.

She found that the TGA had records of various tests on rat testes, but no records of the effect of the vaccine on rat ovaries in the Australian Public Assessment Report for Human Papillomavirus Quadrivalent Vaccine (Gardasil).

Dr. Little's report states that, "It is not known whether this event of premature ovarian failure is linked to the quadrivalent HPV vaccine. More detailed information concerning rat ovarian histology and ongoing fecundity post-HPV vaccination was sought from the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).”

It revealed that “no histological report has been available for vaccinated rat ovaries."

In other words, the TGA had no safety information on the effect of Gardasil on female reproductive systems.

"This event could hold potential implications for population health and prompts further inquiry," Dr. Little's report concluded.

"Gardasil has been controversial from the beginning," noted Steven Mosher of the Population Research Institute.

"While other vaccines protect against diseases spread by casual contact, Gardasil was developed to protect against a sexually transmitted disease," Mosher said, adding that Merck Pharmaceutical has proven effective in lobbying governments around the world to make the vaccine mandatory for schoolchildren.

"Tens of millions of young girls have received the Gardasil vaccine since its approval by the FDA six years ago. If even a tiny fraction of them have experienced infertility as a result, then these girl children have been denied a very fundamental right, that is, the right to decide how many children they want to have," Mosher said.

"In the case of the Australian girl the effect is irreversible. She has lost an integral part of her womanhood, while still but a child,” he said. “Women deserve better."

Gardasil Vaccine update

On numerous occasions recently I have referred to the Gardasil vaccination programme that the Irish Minister for Health, Mary Harney, is imposing on young schoolgirls,see most recent ones August 30 2010 and September 15 2010, I also sent Helth Minister Mary Harney an open letter on the issue as far back as July 2008

Despite many protests, and despite many approaches to the Minister, as well as to other Government officials and the Irish Medicines Board, it seems that the programme is being steadily progressed, even to the detriment of other vaccination programmes, such as those for Rubella, Mumps, etc., for younger children and infants, in that staff is being seconded from that area in order to carry out the Gardasil jabs. Now that the new school term has started, parents and guardians are being asked to complete and sign a ‘consent form’ to allow their daughters to be given the vaccine. (For some girls, this will be their second ‘jab’, as a number of schools were already visited by the Gardasil troops prior to the summer holidays.)
Amongst other questions to be answered on the form are the ‘girl’s name at birth’, and the ‘mother’s maiden name’. Other questions ask whether ‘she’ has had ‘a previous severe reaction to Gardasil’, whether ‘she’ is ‘allergic to any of the vaccine constituents (aluminium hydroxyphosphate sulphate, L-histidine, Polysorbate 80, yeast)’.
If ‘she’ were my daughter I think I would be very wary of that list of constituents, even apart from all the other dangers of the vaccine.
Parents/guardians are also asked whether or not they wish to have their daughter’s HPV vaccination records linked with ‘her’ other HSE (Health Service Executive) immunisation records, and ‘her future cervical cancer screening records with the National Cancer Screening Service’. It should be remembered that the schoolgirls undergoing the vaccination can be as young as 12-13 years of age.
Another question to which the HSE requires an answer is, if not at school or college, whether the girl is being home schooled or is outside the school system.
The HSE does say that all of the information provided will be protected under the Data Protection Acts, 1988 and 2003 – but the information will already be in the government system!

The form also allows for a parent/guardian to decline to give consent for the vaccination, and points out that ‘those over 16 years of age are legally entitled to consent for themselves’.

Finally, and interestingly, the form is called the ‘Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination Consent Form’. We know that HPV is a sexually transmitted disease.
We also know that the minimum legal age for sexual activity is seventeen years.

The following link gives access to You Tube video presentations on the issue which are a must view for parents

Parents BEWARE your teenage daughters life or health could be at grave risk from vaccine

Irish parents – please take note that as from 17 May next, your daughters will be at grave risk in their school. Why? The reason is because Minister for Health, Mary Harney, has announced that on 17 May her ‘cervical cancer vaccination programme’ for schoolgirls will begin – just two weeks before the start of the summer holidays.

We have reported on this issue previously see BLOG Posts Jan 182010 Dec.18 2008

First-year students will be particularly vulnerable. The vaccine, known as Gardasil, is actually a vaccine to prevent HPV (human papilloma virus) which is a sexually-transmitted disease, together with other sexually-transmitted diseases. The vaccine has to be given in three doses over a six-month period. This means that the young girls will have to return to their school in July for the second dose, and they will receive the third dose sometime in November. That’s assuming, of course, that they don’t suffer any ill-effects from the vaccine in the meantime. Sixth-class children who are planning to go to secondary school in September will be vaccinated at that time.

The HPV vaccine, it is reported, ‘which is most effective when given before girls become sexually active, guards against the most common, but not all, strains of the HPV virus which causes cervical cancer.’ Ah! So Gardasil is not a ‘cervical cancer
vaccine’. It is a vaccine to ‘protect’ against sexually transmitted diseases.

Now, why would young girls, at the age of about 11, 12, 13 and 14, need to be vaccinated against sexually transmitted diseases?

The British National Health Service (NHS), is reported as having given bribes in the form of shopping vouchers to girls between the ages of 16 and 18 to persuade them to get the Gardasil vaccine, which has been implicated in numerous cases of severe harm and death. It seems that governments around the world have been pushing Gardasil through national campaigns designed to scare women and girls into getting the vaccine.

Comments on the Irish Medical Times website in relation to Gardasil, include: ‘Parents across the world are coming together, sharing stories, documents and research on the adverse reactions to share with their respective governments. Please educate yourself about this vaccine before your daughter becomes “one less” healthy teenager.’

Already, it appears that there may be some squabbling amongst the nurses’ unions as to how the ‘vaccination programme’ can be rolled out, as public health nurses have an existing backlog of work, particularly because of their involvement in the swine ‘flu vaccination programme. Remember the swine ‘flu vaccination?

Interestingly, the Gardasil vaccination will be ‘offered’ to schoolgirls, and their parents will receive ‘information packs and consent forms’ very soon.

So, parents, please be aware that twenty-one schools around the country – Our Lady’s Grove, Goatstown, Dublin; Loreto Convent, Letterkenny, Co. Donegal; Presentation Secondary School, Kildare Town, Co. Kildare; St. Paul’s Community College, Browne’s Road, Waterford City; Dominican College, Griffith Avenue, Drumcondra, Dublin; to name just some of them – are being targeted in the initial pilot project. Don’t wait and see what happens – act now to protect your daughter from being one of the statistics.

Irish Health Minister introduces Cervical cancer vaccine for teens

In 2008, the Minister for Health and Children, Mary Harney, announced that 30,000 school-children were to be offered the Gardasil cervical cancer vaccination, at a cost to her Department of approximately €15m/€16m, this decision however was subsequently rescinded. On Friday last 15th January Minister Harney announced that this programme will now proceed and that 30,000 girls in first year in secondary school are to be offered the cervical cancer vaccine from later this year at a cost of €3m.(Irish Times article)

Cervical cancer is caused chiefly by the Human Papilloma Virus, which is contracted through sexual activity. What, then, is the provision of a cervical cancer vaccination to young girls saying to them, and what is it saying to their parents? To my mind (and many other parents agree with me) it is saying that – ‘We know that your daughter will probably be sexually active while she is still in school, or she might be.’

We blogged on this issue on several occasions and sent an open letter to Minister Harney at that time pointing out that apart from the obvious moral objections there had been very a very significant level of adverse reactions to the vaccine. We pointed out for example that in 2007 and up to mid 2008 deaths attributed to the vaccine were running at one per month (10 deaths in 10 months). The US FDA (Food and Drug Administration agency) we said,

“also produced 140 "serious" reports (27 of which were categorized as "life threatening"), 10 spontaneous abortions and six cases of Guillain-Barre Syndrome - all since January 2008. The watchdog group says the number of deaths associated with the vaccine is at least 18 and possibly as many as 20 in the US alone. The serious adverse events include anaphylactic shock, grand mal convulsion, foaming at mouth, coma, paralysis, and death.”

The programme was subsequently withdrawn by the Minister citing lack of funds.

It seems rather odd (or does it?) that the vaccination is now to be re-offered to schoolchildren, but at a reduced cost of about €3m. In October 2009 Dr. Diane Harper, the leading international developer of the HPV vaccines, gave a sales pitch for Gardasil, (see article Merck Researcher admits: Gardasil Guards Against Almost Nothing.)

Far from reassuring her audience that Gardasil was safe and efficacious Dr Harper told her audience that:

*70% of HPV infections resolve themselves without treatment in one year. After two years, this rate climbs to 90%. Of the remaining 10% of HPV infections, only half coincide with the development of cervical cancer.

* the incidence of cervical cancer in the U.S. is so low that “if we get the vaccine and continue PAP screening, we will not lower the rate of cervical cancer in the US.”

* “There have been no efficacy trials in girls under 15 years,”

Dr. Harper, then in an interview with ABC News, admitted that “The rate of serious adverse events (for the vaccine) is greater than the incidence rate of cervical cancer.”

Given this frank assessment of the vaccine it is hard to understand why Minister Harney decided to introduce it.

The questions that must be asked are, why is the Minister and her Department proceeding with this initiative when the risks associated with the vaccine are so serious and are already in the public domain?
and
Why did the cost of the vaccine drop so significantly in such a short time? Is this reduction due to the adverse publicity based on both the record of adverse reactions to the vaccine and the negative publicity created by Dr. Harpers frank admissions?

The other questions that must be asked are does the Minister and her Department believe there is an acceptable level of risk and if so what is that level?

There is one certain method to avoid HPV – it is called abstinence.

HPV Vaccine hits the headlines again

The controversial vaccine against cervical cancer has hit the headlines again with a woman claiming her 12-year-old daughter became paralysed after receiving the injection. Doctors and health officials are denying that Ashleigh Cave's collapse and subsequent paralysis have anything to do with the Cervarix vaccine (similar to Gardasil) but the cause of her illness has not been identified and critics argue that the five-year pilot study was too short to ensure the safety of the drug.

Jackie Fletcher of Jabs, an organisation campaigning against the use of this vaccine, stated: "We should halt the HPV vaccine programme in the UK until we get to the bottom of whether this poor girl's paralysis was caused by the vaccine or not."

More on the HPV Vaccine

The controversy surrounding the HPV vaccine has hit the headlines again, with a Catholic school in Manchester informing parents that the school would not be providing the vaccine and that parents should make their own arrangements for their daughters. The decision has been greeted by a great deal of emotive hype from the media, but as Mulier Fortis has mentioned, one of the issues ignored by the media with regard to the HPV vaccine are the very real fears of side-effects and health complications.

The moral implications of the vaccine have provoked heated debates throughout Catholic blogosphere with committed pro-lifers coming down strongly on both sides of the argument. As I have stated in a previous post, even setting aside the moral concerns about this vaccine, the health risks cannot be ignored. Since its introduction, deaths resulting from this vaccine run at an average of one per month, alongside 140 cases of serious complications including coma, paralysis and anaphalactic shock.

I would not wish cancer on anyone, particularly my own daughter, but nor would I be prepared to put my daughter at risk of serious health complications for the sake of a vaccine that has been rushed into circulation and remains of questionable medical value.